Is it primarily a concern for the good of society or for the rights of individuals that leads Mill to assert his principle of the liberty of action?

Should sane adults be allowed to commit suicide, according to Mill's principles?

Does the present state of human society reflect that "man is a progressive being (p. 19)?"

How do we know that "mankind" is better off under conditions of liberty (p. 21)?

Does constant questioning of accepted standards of behavior make a society stronger?

Does Mill's defense of free opinion apply to cases of whistle-blowing and leaking?

Is the individual sovereign over his or her property, as "over his own body & mind (p. 18?)"